Attached. Please let me know if you have any questions or need revisions.I.A.IntroductionTopic/focus of the essayThe Killer ShowB.Thesis StatementThe management and other staff at the Station Night Club did not practice collective responsibility toensure people’s safety and the maximum capacity of people at the club, which led to the fire andconsequent deaths and injuries.II.First paragraph descriptionA.Summary of the first piece of supporting evidence/informationBarylick attempts to make sense of what happened at the Station Night Club, why it happened, andwhat could have been done to prevent the tragic events.B.Summary of the second piece of supporting evidence/informationIn the novel, Barylick mentions that “It didn’t hurt that the Fine Line’s crowd was well below its legalmaximum when the fire broke out. That was not the case at the Station” (Barylick, 2012).III.A.Second paragraph descriptionSummary of the first piece of supporting evidence/informationSince the fire is treated as a mystery where Barylick tries to put the puzzle pieces together, he comesto another suggestion that strikes my understanding of events.B.Summary of the second piece of supporting evidence/informationAlthough the fire at the Station seems sudden and unfortunate, the management’s vigilance acts asanother way to prevent pyrotechnics from entering the club.IV.A.Third paragraph descriptionSummary of the first piece of supporting evidence/informationThe author also questions, “why did Larocque cite other, less significant, code violations while he letthe ‘solid gasoline’ on the walls slide?” (Barylick, 2012).B.Summary of the second piece of supporting evidence/informationThe point is surprising because the restrictions to use such materials by law did not bother the club’smanagement.V.Fourth paragraph descriptionA.Summary of the first piece of supporting evidence/informationIn the author’s first evidence, he says that witnesses recall being turned back by bouncers to use theband door (Barylick, 2012).B.Summary of the second piece of supporting evidence/informationThis is surprising because, in case of an emergency, there are no particular doors for anyone to passthrough since the management and other concerned parties’ central concern should focus on gettingpeople to safety.VI.A.Fifth paragraph descriptionSummary of the first piece of supporting evidence/informationThe Station Night club seems to have avoided or ignored the laws set by allowing the Great Whiteband to use pyrotechnics.B.Summary of the second piece of supporting evidence/information. Although the events cannot be taken back through a lawsuit, the victims’ families should sue theStation Night club for compensation as a lesson for the night club to follow safety rules andregulations.VII.A.ConclusionRestatement of thesisThe management and other staff at the Station Night Club did not practice collective responsibility toensure people’s safety and the maximum capacity of people at the club, which led to the fire andconsequent deaths and injuries.B.Concluding remarksThe author’s opinion provides insight into points where the reader can identify and analyze accordingto their view of events planning and management.Running head: THE KILLER SHOW1The Killer ShowName of StudentInstitutional AffiliationTHE KILLER SHOW2The Killer ShowThe Killer Show by John Barylick is a book that explains the sudden events that tookplace at the Station in West Warwick, robbing 96 people of their lives while leaving 200 injuredpeople. During rock music performance, the deaths and injuries occurred, where the Great Whiteband ignited a blaze from pyrotechnics and lit polyurethane in the “egg crate” form insulated onthe club’s wall. The death and injury occurred approximately ten minutes after the flame was lit.This shows how intense the flames were to cause such massive damage within a short time.Three months later, the death toll was confirmed to reach 100 people from the incident.However, the blaze at Fine Line Club in Minneapolis was handled differently when Jet City Fix,a Seattle band, illegally set pyrotechnics on fire at its ceiling. The fire immediately started, andautomatic sprinklers from the ceiling opened and set out the fire before any injury could oc…
Our customer is the center of what we do and thus we offer 100% original essays..
By ordering our essays, you are guaranteed the best quality through our qualified experts.All your information and everything that you do on our website is kept completely confidential.
Academicwritingcompany.com always strives to give you the best of its services. As a custom essay writing service, we are 100% sure of our services. That is why we ensure that our guarantee of money-back stands, alwaysRead more
The paper that you order at academicwritingcompany.com is 100% original. We ensure that regardless of the position you are, be it with urgent deadlines or hard essays, we give you a paper that is free of plagiarism. We even check our orders with the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the industry.Read more
The Academicwritingcompany.com thrives on excellence and thus we help ensure the Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order.To do so, we provide a Free Revision policy as a courtesy service. To receive free revision the Academic writing Company requires that the you provide the request within Fifteen (14) days since the completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations and research papers.Read more
With Academicwritingcompan.com, your privacy is the most important aspect. First, the academic writing company will never resell your personal information, which include credit cards, to any third party. Not even your lecturer on institution will know that you bought an essay from our academic writing company.Read more
The academic writing company writers know that following essay instructions is the most important part of academic writing. The expert writers will, therefore, work extra hard to ensure that they cooperate with all the requirements without fail. We also count on you to help us provide a better academic paper.Read more